Ebling v. Borough of Schuylkill Haven
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 369, Jan. T., 1913, by plaintiffs, from decree of' C. P. Schuylkill Co., July T., 1912, No. 1, in Equity, dismissing bill in equity for an injunction in case of John M. Ebling, Augusta dwell, and Edward E. Weiser v. The Borough of Schuylkill Haven. Bill in equity for an injunction. Before Bechtel, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. The court on final hearing dismissed the bill. Error assigned, among others, was the decree of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Mesteezat,
We have examined this record with care and are not convinced of any reversible error. There are irregularities in the procedure arising from the disregard by the court and counsel of the equity rules, but we will not impose additional expense on the litigants and longer delay the adjudication of their rights, as the evidence and the manner of the submission of the case warrant the final decree entered by the learned court in banc.
■ This was a bill filed by the plaintiffs to restrain the Borough of Schuylkill Haven from entering into contracts for grading and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Myers v. Consumers' Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
3Cited by8 opinions
- McCormick's Contested ElectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Kicinko v. PetruskaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Carney v. Penn Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Hirshhorn v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Thomas v. WatersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.