Legal Opinion

Hirshhorn v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 2, 1953No. 10894_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff, a resident of New York, appeals from the dismissal of his complaint by the district, court, sitting without a jury. The action is a double derivative stockholders’' suit on behalf of plaintiff and other stockholders of Carbon Monoxide Eliminator Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and Catalyst Research Corporation, a Maryland corporation. The defendants are the two named corporations and Mine Safety Appliances Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, as well as various directors and officers of the three' corporations and their representatives. For…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Dodge v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Weisbecker v. Hosiery Patents, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Bowman v. Gum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Hogle v. DeLong Hook & Eye Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Company v. Hattie A. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  2. Hartley Pen Co. v. Lindy Pen Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
  3. United States v. Ivy Hall Apartments, Inc. And Leon SidellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  4. In Re REA Express, Inc., Private Treble Damage, Etc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Aetna-Standard Engineering Co. v. RowlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API