Legal Opinion

State v. Robert Eugene Stewart

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 2016No. Docket 43453PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMelanson, Chief Judge

Robert Eugene Stewart appeals from the district court’s order for restitution following Stewart’s plea of guilty to operating a vehicle without the owner’s consent. Stewart argues that the district court abused its discretion in ordering Stewart to pay restitution for vehicle repairs. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, Stewart pled guilty to operating a vehicle without the owner’s consent, I.C. § 49-227, and agreed to pay restitution for damages caused when he drove the vehicle through a fence. At the restitution hearing, the State presented testimony…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. RaudebaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. StevensIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. CorbusIdaho Supreme Court · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Ali HabebIdaho Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. State v. Ali HabebIdaho Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. State v. MooreIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. State v. OchoaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API