Commonwealth v. Barros
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
After the defendant was tried in the Superior Court, convicted of several offenses, and sentenced, he appealed from Ms sentences to the Appellate Division of the Superior Court. See G. L. c. 278, § 28B. The Appellate Division modified one of Ms tMee sentences.1 The Commonwealth then filed a petition in the county court pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, challenging the Appellate Division’s decision. A single justice of this court deMed the petition without a hearing, and the Commonwealth appeals. The sole, very limited question before us is whether the single justice committed a clear error of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SanchezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Commonwealth v. ColemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Fogarty v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Commonwealth v. FranksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Commonwealth v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FontanezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- Jones v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Commonwealth v. BynoeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
- Cucinelli v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
- Commonwealth v. Tobias T.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.