Legal Opinion
Invivo Research, Inc. v. Magnetic Resonance Equipment Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 6, 2000No. 99 Civ. 11863 (RWS)PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The defendants Magnetic Resonance Equipment Corporation (“MRE”) and Me-drad, Inc. (“Medrad”) have moved pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) for an order transferring this patent infringement action to the Western District of Pennsylva nia where a declaratory judgment action raising identical issues is pending. Plaintiff Invivo Research, Inc. (“Invivo”) opposes the motion. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.
The Parties
Invivo is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Oklahoma with its principal place of business in Orlando, Florida.
MRE…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Continental Grain Co. v. Barge FBL-585Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First City National Bank and Trust Company v. Freddy L. Simmons, and Herman Carter MoodyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- William Gluckin & Co., Inc. v. International Playtex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Neil Bros. Ltd. v. World Wide Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. v. Lexar Media, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Dickerson v. Novartis Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Acterna, L.L.C. v. Adtech, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
- Excelsior Designs, Inc. v. SheresDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.