Rodman v. Musselman
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 29 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT. CITED Civil Code, sections 474, 246. 5 Iowa, 123, Taylor v. B. & M. R. R. Co. 7 Mon. 439, Divine v. Harvie. 4 Bush, 8. 3 Mete. 309, Roberts v. Drinkard. 10 B. Mon. 109, Speed, &c. v. Brown, &c. 26 Ala., Mayor of Mobile v. Howland. 41 Ala. 508, City, &c. v. Van Dorn. CITED 7 Mass. 289: 4 Howard, 20. 8 Penn. St. 868. 3 Rob. La. 373. 7 Mon. 439. . 1 Root, 551. 3 Saund. 379. 11 Pick. 260. 2 Cranch C. 0. 544.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE ELLIOTT
delivered the opinion oe the court.
Having obtained a judgment on a return of “no property-found” against the appellee, A. J. Musselman, the appellant instituted his action under the 474th section of the Code for discovery of the said appellee’s effects, and also sued out an attachment against him. Appellant’s judgment debt amounted to $300 with interest from the 17th of April, 1873, till paid.
It appears in evidence that the appellee, A. J. Musselman, was marshal of the city of Louisville at the time of this suit, and so continued for some time thereafter, and that during the ■…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tracy v. HornbuckleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1871
- Speed v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1849
3Cited by6 opinions
- Duval County v. Charleston Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1903
- Ames v. Union CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1889
- Dickinson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
- Dodd v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Teves v. ReadeHawaii Supreme Court · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.