Legal Opinion

Speed v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 29, 1849PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal prom the Louisville Chancery Court. Equitable interests and dioses in action. Town and City officers.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Gkaham

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Brown, Curtis and Yance, judgment creditors of Speed, being unable to collect their debt by execution, on the 26th July, 1848, exhibited this suit in chancery, to enjoin the City of Louisville from paying to Speed so much of his salary, as City Marsha], due and payable 31st July, 1848, as would pay their • demand. Speed’s salary is $750 per annum, payable monthly; that is, $62 50 at the close of each month. Speed, in his answer, states that in the month when the bill was filed he had in his hands monies of the city, received in discharge of the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Holt v. ThurmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  2. Batesville Casket Co. v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  3. Dickinson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  4. Rodman v. MusselmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876
  5. Dodd v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API