Legal Opinion

Frye v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1930No. 22279. Department TwoPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action is based upon an insurance policy. The cause was tried to the court and a jury. At the conclusion of all the evidence, the plaintiff moved for a directed verdict and the defendant for a nonsuit. The trial court overruled the defendant’s motion, and sustained the motion of the plaintiff. A directed verdict was returned. The defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and also for a new trial, both of which motions were overruled. Judgment was entered upon the verdict, from which the defendant appeals.

The appellant is an insurance corporation organized under the laws of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. BabcockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Clay v. Phœnix InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Markey v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  4. Unterharnscheidt v. Missouri State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. Bowen v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. McHorseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Sinclair Wyoming Refining Company v. Infrassure, LtdWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  3. McGreevy v. OREGON MUTUAL INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  4. Webster v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. Harlow v. North American Accident InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API