Harlow v. North American Accident Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeeler, J.
We shall refer to the defendant as “Company” and to the insured as “Hart.”
The plaintiff, as beneficiary named in an accident and sickness insurance policy, brought this action upon the policy. The case came on for trial before the court and a jury. At the conclusion of the introduction of the evidence, the court instructed the jury to return a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand dollars, the amount stated in the policy. Thereafter, the Company filed a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto, or, in the alternative, for a new trial. This motion was overruled and judgment…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Starr v. Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Stanley v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
- Stephenson v. AllisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Porter v. Mutual Life Ins.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Meadows v. Peoples Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
- Stanton v. Public Employees Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- Kinney v. Northern Life Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1939