Legal Opinion
Webster v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INSURANCE
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 15, 1989No. 9229-1-IIIPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
54 Wn. App. 492 (1989)
774 P.2d 50
ROBERT L. WEBSTER, ET AL, Respondents,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., Appellant.
No. 9229-1-III.
The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.
June 15, 1989.
Timothy Cronin and Mullin, Etter & Cronin, for appellant.
David Grant and Crary & Clark, for respondents.
GREEN, J.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company appeals a judgment "stacking" uninsured motorist coverage under three State Farm policies issued to Robert and Patricia Webster. State Farm contends this was error. We agree and reverse.
The Websters insured their vehicles with State…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bering v. ShareWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- E-Z Loader Boat Trailers, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Foremost Insurance v. PutzierIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Estill v. Sisters of CharityWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. v. R. E. Parsons Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Citizens for Clean Air v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- McGreevy v. OREGON MUTUAL INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- Mattingly v. Palmer Ridge Homes LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Mattingly v. Palmer Ridge Homes, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Phoenix Indemnity Insurance Co. v. Estate of BellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.