Legal Opinion

Midget Products, Inc. v. Jacobsen

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 5, 1956No. Civ. 20928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Parker), J.

In this action for declaratory relief and injunction, the defendants appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs intend to manufacture and sell a food product, which contains no milk or milk fat, and is known as Mel-O-Dee Whip Topping and also known as Mel-O-Dee Zert Topping. (For convenience, the Midget Products, Inc., will be referred to as the plaintiff.) The product is intended for use by bakers, confectioners, and others as a topping for pies, cakes, sundaes, and other foods. The Director of Agriculture of California is of the opinion that the product is an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hebe Co. v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Brock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. In Re Application of ReinegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. United States v. 651 CASES, ETC.District Court, N.D. New York · 1953

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tip Top Foods, Inc. v. LyngCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Coffee-Rich, Inc. v. FielderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Coffee-Rich, Inc. v. Kansas State Board of HealthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  4. Aeration Processes, Inc. v. Commissioner of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  5. Aeration Processes, Inc. v. JacobsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API