Legal Opinion
Aeration Processes, Inc. v. Commissioner of Public Health
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 6, 1963PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.
This bill of complaint seeks a declaration as to the applicability of G. L. c. 94, § 187, as amended through St. 1948, c. 598, § 2, 1 to Instantblend, a vegetable product resembling cream and served and used with coffee at public, or employer maintained, eating places.
The plaintiffs are Aeration Processes, Inc. (Aeration), an Ohio corporation which owns the formula of Instant-blend, and Instantwhip-Boston, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation, which as a licensee of Aeration manufactures and sells Instantblend within the Commonwealth. Aeration “purchase[s] and . . . [has] prepared certain dry…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Plumley v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Cloverleaf Butter Co. v. Patterson, Commissioner of Agriculture & IndustriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc. v. Department of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Coffee-Rich, Inc. v. Commissioner of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Coffee-Rich, Inc. v. Department of AgricultureWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Cast Iron Soil Pipe Institute v. Board of State Examiners of Plumbers & Gas FittersMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- People Ex Rel. Orcutt v. Instantwhip Denver, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.