Legal Opinion

Hughes Bros. v. Ætna Ins.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1923PublishedCited by 30 opinions

PROM WASHINGTON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Washington County. — Hon. Hal H. Haynes, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Green

Hughes Bros, were general merchants in the village of Elk Park, N. C. Their store was destroyed by fire November 2, 1921. Prior to that time, on July 26, 1921, policies of insurance aggregating $12,000, covering their stock, written by defendant companies were issued to Hughes Bros.

After the fire, the complainants Hughes Bros, made demand upon the defendants, ¿Etna Insurance Company and others, to settle the loss, which demand ivas finally refused. Hughes Bros, were considerably indebted, and assigned their lights under the several policies to Thad A. Cox, trustee for their creditors, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Volunteer State Life Ins. v. RichardsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Continental Fire Insurance v. WhitakerTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Meckleburg Real Estate Co. v. Kyoleum Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Standard Life Ins. Co. of the South v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1935
  2. National Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. American Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
  3. Little v. Washington Nat. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951
  4. National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1935
  5. Tedder v. Home Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API