Legal Opinion

State v. Daniels

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 16, 1982No. 8214SC174PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Defendant contends the court erred in denying his motion for mistrial made after a prospective juror stated before the entire panel that a co-defendant, tried jointly with defendant, “used to go with [her] daughter and also . . . took [her] car at one time.” The statement was made in response to the court’s question as to whether any member of the panel knew the co-defendant.

“Ruling on a motion for mistrial in a criminal case less than capital rests largely in the discretion of the trial court.” State v. McCraw, 300 N.C. 610, 620, 268 S.E. 2d 173, 179 (1980). While G.S.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. SwiftSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. AbernathySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API