Legal Opinion
Twogood v. Wentz
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 16, 2001No. 20010106PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Bonnie Twogood appeals a summary judgment dismissing her negligence claim against defendants Douglas N. Os-trom, Mar Jean Selby, and Betty Jaegar (collectively, the “landlords”). In addition to granting summary judgment, the trial court assessed costs in the amount of $1300.00 against Twogood. Twogood paid this cost judgment. Because the cost judgment did not go to the merits of the case and was paid under duress, we find the satisfaction of the cost judgment did not waive Twogood’s right to appeal. Finding no duty on the part of the landlords, we affirm the summary…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Uccello v. LaudenslayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Fetch v. QuamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Latendresse v. LatendresseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Doan Ex Rel. Doan v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Rogstad v. Dakota Gasification Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Mr. G's Turtle Mountain Lodge, Inc. v. Roland TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Riemers v. OmdahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Wahl v. Country Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- DeCoteau v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Ramsey Financial Corp. v. HauglandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.