Legal Opinion
Latendresse v. Latendresse
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 20, 1980No. Civ. 9583PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSand, Justice
(on reassignment).
This appeal by Orville and Ruth Laten-dresse from a summary judgment is a sequel to Latendresse v. Latendresse, 283 N.W.2d 70 (N.D.1979), wherein we declined to dismiss the appeal filed by Orville and Ruth Latendresse and permitted them to correct the defects in the appeal within fifteen days. In this case, except for the brief filed by an attorney, Orville acted pro se, but in 283 N.W.2d 70 Orville and Ruth were represented by counsel.
The facts leading to the summary judgment are succinctly stated in 283 N.W.2d 70:
“Albert commenced an action against Orville and Ruth for the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Marshall v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Johnson Ex Rel. Johnson v. American Motors Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Clausen & Sons, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Albers v. NoDak Racing Club, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Robert Allen French v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Matter of Estate of StantonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Martin v. SimmonsMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Miller Enterprises, Inc. v. Dog N' Cat Pet Centers of America, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Doan Ex Rel. Doan v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Matter of Estates of KjorvestadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.