Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Kmart Corp.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided January 9, 2009No. Civ. No. 07-5080-KESPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL THIRD-PARTY AFFIDAVITS [DOCKET 86]
VERONICA L. DUFFY, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court pursuant to defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff to produce third-party witness affidavits. [Docket 86]. Defendant has represented to the court that it has made a good-faith effort to resolve this discovery dispute without the court’s intervention. See Docket 87. Defendant’s motion to compel was referred to this magistrate judge for resolution pursuant to Chief Judge Karen E. Sehreier’s order dated November 3, 2008. [Docket 94].
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Debra A. And George Simon v. G.D. Searle & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Stanley D. Rabushka, Ex Rel. United States of America Stanley D. Rabushka v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. Edgewood Properties, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- American Oversight v. U.S. Dep't of Just.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- Martensen v. KochDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2014
- Bell v. Lackawanna CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Boyer v. GildeaDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.