Legal Opinion
United States v. Poly-Carb, Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided December 3, 1996No. CV-N-91-360-ECRPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EDWARD C. REED, Jr., District Judge.
The United States of America (“Plaintiff”) (Doc. # 88) and Montana Refining Company (“Defendant”) (Doe. # 90) have renewed their motions for summary judgment in this action brought under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. § 9601-9675 (“CERCLA”). Because we find that there exist several genuine issues of material fact regarding liability, and that no reasonable jury could find for Defendant as to all other material facts bearing on liability, we DENY Defendant’s renewed summary judgment motion…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- William Earl Warren III v. City of Carlsbad Brian Watson James Thompson Frank Mannen Raymond Patchett Stewart Gary Ann JansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Castaic Lake Water Agency v. Whittaker Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- United States v. Iron Mountain Mines, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1997
- Rivas v. Safety-Kleen CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. JacksonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
- Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Interstate Non-Ferrous Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.