Legal Opinion
Frost v. Frost
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 24, 1947PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStoddart, J.
Two motions. The plaintiff’s motion is for an order directing the entry of a judgment for arrears in alimony, and the defendant, by cross motion, applies for a modification of the final judgment of divorce by eliminating the provision for alimony.
*134The parties were divorced in 1932 and the plaintiff was awarded $30 a week for the support of herself and of their two children. In 1939 the parties resumed living together, without any ceremony legalizing the relationship, which continued until January 18, 1947. On that date, they separated.
The plaintiff desires to enter a judgment for the arrears…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Erkenbrach v. . ErkenbrachNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Wilson v. . HinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Livingston v. . LivingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- New York & Oswego Midland Railroad v. Van HornNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rice v. RiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Gough v. GoughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Lichtig v. LichtigSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1960
- Wilkins v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Lichtig v. LichtigSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1960