McKechnie v. Stanke
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
In this action for medical malpractice, plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of four of six defendants.1 We affirm.
We review a summary judgment to determine whether the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ORCP 47C; Seeborg v. General Motors Corporation, 284 Or 695, 699, 588 P2d 1100 (1978). The moving party must establish that there are no genuine issues of material fact. Park v. Hoffard, 315 Or 624, 627, 847 P2d 852 (1993). We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion. Tolbert v. First National Bank, 312 Or 485,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Tolbert v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Park v. HoffardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Duncan v. AugterOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Jones v. Salem HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McKechnie v. StankeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993