Legal Opinion
United States v. Dederich
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 19, 1987No. Nos. 86-1387, 86-1388, 87-7052 and 87-7055PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS INTERLOCUTORY APPEALS
CONDITIONAL PETITIONS FOR MANDAMUS
Eight defendants appeal the district court’s denial of their motions to dismiss an indictment on grounds of prosecutorial misconduct before the grand jury. Two of the defendants, Dederich and Missakian, also separately appeal the district court’s denial of their motion to dismiss the indictment for violation of transactional immunity granted by the Superior Court of California. Each of the appeals is accompanied by an alternative, conditional petition for a writ of mandamus. The government moves…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. Scott A. FountainCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Commonwealth v. KhoreySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- United States v. Lonson Jaa Luloff, United States of America v. Lonson Jaa Luloff, United States of America v. Lonson Jaa LuloffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Christopher J. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. The Larouche CampaignCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.