Legal Opinion

Matter of E.A.O.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1991No. S-3467PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

In this appeal from the superior court, the mother and guardian ad litem of E.A.O. seek to clarify the responsibility of the Department of Health and Social Services for the medical costs of children in the department’s legal custody who are placed in their parents’ home. The superior court held that in such a case the department has no responsibility. We reverse.

I

E.A.O. was born prematurely on June 11, 1987, at Anchorage’s Humana Hospital and soon transferred to Providence Hospital’s Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. On August 12, 1988, the Department of Health and Social…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. RLR v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. AlexAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Doe v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. In Re the Estate of HutchinsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State, Department of Natural Resources v. City of HainesAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rollins v. State, Department of Revenue, Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. M.R.S. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Anchorage School District v. HaleAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. M.R.S. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1994
  5. Gregory Kisling v. Paul Grosz, Paul Grosz v. Gregory KislingAlaska Supreme Court · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API