Westwood Chemical, Inc. v. Molded Fiber Glass Body Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the District Court wherein Westwood Chemical, Inc. was held to be estopped from asserting the validity of claims 5, 10, 12 and 13 of United States Patent No. 2,742,378. We affirm.
For an extensive discussion of the facts of this case reference is made to the opinion of District Judge William K. Thomas, reported at 181 U.S.P.Q. 134 (N.D. Ohio 1973). A summary of the pertinent facts will be stated in this opinion to' the extent necessary to dispose of the issues presented on appeal.
This action began in 1963 when West-wood sued the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Westwood Chemical, Inc. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Plastic Container Corporation v. Continental Plastics of Oklahoma, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- Bourns, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Westwood Chemical, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- George Dickstein v. Seventy Corporation and Peter Boyko, George Dickstein v. Grantham, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Arco Industries Corporation v. Chemcast Corporation, C. J. Edwards and Phillip L. Rubright, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.