Legal Opinion
Garcia v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 9, 1998No. CIV. A. 97-1698(JR)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ROBERTSON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are five federal workers who were mistakenly permitted to remain enrolled in the Civil Service Retirement System *41(“CSRS”) after the Federal Employee Retirement System (“FERS”) replaced CSRS in 1987. The Office of Personnel Management corrected the errors between 1994 and 1996, but plaintiffs claim that the corrections were insufficient to make them whole for financial losses they suffered, and they have sued for compensation. Defendant moves to dismiss all of plaintiffs claims, which are brought under the Back Pay Act, the Tucker Act, and two…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Beckman v. FarmerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Bell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- James B. King, Director, Office of Personnel Management v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
3Cited by7 opinions
- Trusted Integration, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Athey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Firestone v. Fed. Ret. Thrift Inv. Bd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Anthony D. Natty v. Administrator of Thrift Saving Plans and or Legal Department (Does)District Court, C.D. California · 2023
- Firestone v. Federal Retirement Thrift Investment BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.