Legal Opinion
Bell v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 8, 1991No. Nos. 687-88C, 688-88C and 689-88CPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*75OPINION AND ORDER
TURNER, Judge.
In these civilian pay cases, three former federal employees claim entitlement to severance pay under 5 U.S.C. § 5595 following their resignation from employment with the Federal Aviation Administration at Memphis, Tennessee. The allegations of fact and law in each case are identical.
This opinion addresses cross-motions for summary judgment.1 Two issues are presented by the parties. The government asserts that this court lacks jurisdiction to decide cases involving employee resignations which are alleged to be involuntary separations from federal service;…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Elias Covington v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Margaret J. Schultz v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Harvey M. Scharf v. Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Canonica v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Hall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Heaphy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Abramson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Thomas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.