Gee v. Timineri
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtJefferson, J.
Harry Gee and Harry Gee Associates, Inc. (whom we shall refer to in the singular since Harry Gee is the owner and principal officer of the corporation) brought an action based on a common count for money had and received, seeking a judgment against defendant Anthony Timineri in the amount of $11,000. Plaintiff’s claim arose out of, and was based on, a contract entered into between the parties which purported to settle a dispute between them concerning their former joint business relationship. Defendant answered with a general denial and filed a cross-complaint alleging two causes of action…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Pruett v. BurrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Reisman v. Los Angeles City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Eye v. Kafer, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Western Specialty Co. v. Clairemont Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. DorseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- People v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- County of Sonoma v. GRANT W.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- People v. GinerisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. GinerisAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.