Legal Opinion

Carl v. National Fidelity Life Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1955No. 21975PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROADDUS, Judge.

This is a suit upon an alleged insurance agreement. Defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s second amended petition was sustained by the trial court. Plaintiff elected to stand upon said petition and refused to plead further. Whereupon the court dismissed said petition with prejudice and entered final judgment for defendant. Plaintiff has appealed.

*872Plaintiff’s second amended petition, omitting caption and signatures, is as follows:

“In an effort to comply with the ruling of the court of December 8, the plaintiff amends his petition as follows:
“1. Plaintiff states that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Upon the Information of Shartel v. Missouri Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  2. Rhodus v. Kansas City Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. State Ex Rel. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. ShainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. Francis v. Supreme Lodge Ancient Order of United WorkmenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. McLain v. Mercantile Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Betty Jean Kirschner Wolters v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  2. Summers v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API