Legal Opinion
Schweitzer v. Inv. Comm. of the Phillips 66 Sav. Plan
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided May 9, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. H–17–3013Published
1Opinion of the Court
SIM LAKE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
*611Plaintiffs, Jeffery Schweitzer, Jonathan Sapp, Raul Ramos, and Donald Fowler, bring this action pursuant to Sections 404, 405, 409, and 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1104, 1105, 1109, and 1132, on behalf of the Phillips 66 Savings Plan (the "Plan" or the "Phillips 66 Plan") and a class of similarly situated participants in the Plan whose retirement assets were invested in the "ConocoPhillips Stock Fund" and the "ConocoPhillips Leveraged Stock Fund" (together, the "ConocoPhillips Funds") through the Plan during…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Lawrence H. Ramming v. United States of America, John Thomas Cloud v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.