Legal Opinion
Kidd v. Paxton
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
Decided August 26, 1999No. 07-99-0157-CVPublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
BRIAN QUINN, Justice.
Pending before the court is the motion for rehearing of Marvin and Dorothy Kidd. Said motion is denied.
Background
We dismissed this cause by opinion and judgment dated June 9, 1999. The Kidds had filed their notice of appeal 14 days after the deadline prescribed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1(a) and on the last day before expiration of the period in which an extension could be sought. See Tex.R.App. P. 26.3 (stating that one can move to extend the time to perfect appeal if he acts within 16 days after expiration of the deadline for filing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jones v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Associates, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
- Meshwert v. MeshwertTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Garcia v. Kastner Farms, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Texas Department of Human Services v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- In the Interest of B.G.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Woodard v. Higgins, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
- Harris County v. Inter Nos, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- Rodman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
- Industrial Services U.S.A., Inc. v. American Bank, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.