Legal Opinion
Rodman v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
Decided August 8, 2000No. 07-00-0333-CRPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION TO RECONSIDER
PHIL JOHNSON, Justice.
Appellant’s Motion to Reconsider is granted. We withdraw our prior opinion and issue this opinion in its place.
Appellant Karl Rodman appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery. We dismiss for want of jurisdiction.
BACKGROUND
Appellant was convicted by a jury in the 182nd District Court of Harris County (the trial court) on a charge of aggravated robbery. On April 26, 2000, pursuant to the jury’s verdict on punishment, the trial court imposed sentence of confinement for 10 years and a fine of $10,000. Sentence was suspended and appellant was placed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Olivo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Slaton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Meshwert v. MeshwertTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Garcia v. Kastner Farms, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Kidd v. Paxton, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999
3Cited by22 opinions
- Castillo, Ex Parte Mario AmaroCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Hykonnen v. Baker Hughes Business Support Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
- A.J. Morris v. Frost National Bank and De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
- A.J. Morris v. Frost National Bank and De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
- Amegy Bank of Texas, N.A. v. Titan Services, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.