Legal Opinion
Bone v. Yellow Cab Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 1, 1926No. 19527. Department TwoPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
By this action, the plaintiff sought recovery for personal injuries, claimed to be due to negligence chargeable to the defendant. A trial to the court and a jury resulted in a verdict in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff made a motion for new trial, which was sustained and an order entered granting the new trial. From this order, the defendant appeals.
The case was here upon a former appeal, 129 Wash. 503, 225 Pac. 440, after a judgment had been entered on the verdict of the jury in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed. The case was reversed on account of error in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rotting v. ClemanWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Crowl v. West Coast Steel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- Morehouse v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Griggs v. MacLeanWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Holloway v. SavageWashington Supreme Court · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Davis v. RiegelWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Shook v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Wood v. HallenbarterWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Applewhite v. WayneWashington Supreme Court · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.