Legal Opinion

Kent Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. Ransom

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Kent. ' Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, C. J.

Hansom brought assumpsit to recover a balance claimed for personal labor performed under a written agreement with the plaintiff in error. The cause was tried by the court, without a jury, and a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff. The case comes here on writ of error.

The first and second errors assigned relate to the testimony of the witnesses, Jacobs and Knight, in answer to interrogatories. The services which the plaintiff was to perform were to be rendered at Grand Hapids, in this State, while the witnesses interrogated resided at Sandusky, Ohio, and the question asked was what in…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. PrevostMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Turnbull v. RichardsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Kelley v. RichardsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Lungerhausen v. CrittendenMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Baker v. Hall-Dodds Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API