Legal Opinion

Brendan McKown v. Simon Property Group Inc

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 6, 2012No. 11-35461PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

For the reasons explained below, we respectfully certify to the Washington Supreme Court the following questions:

1) Does Washington adopt Restatement (Second) of Torts § 344 (1965), including comments d and f, as controlling law? See Nivens v. 7-11 Hoagy’s Corner, 133 Wash.2d 192, 943 P.2d 286 (1997).

2) To create a genuine issue of material fact as to the foreseeability of the harm resulting from a third party’s criminal act when the defendant did not know of the dangerous propensities of the individual responsible for the criminal act, must a plaintiff show previous acts of similar…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McLeod v. Grant County School District No. 128Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Nelson v. City of IrvineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Hilton v. Hallmark CardsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Christen v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Nivens v. CornerWashington Supreme Court · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McKown v. Simon Property Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Centurion Properties III, LLC v. Chicago Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Carrington v. City of Tacoma, Department of Public Utilities, Light DivisionDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2017
  4. Jack Potter v. City of LaceyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  5. Sadid v. VailasDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API