Brendan McKown v. Simon Property Group Inc
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
For the reasons explained below, we respectfully certify to the Washington Supreme Court the following questions:
1) Does Washington adopt Restatement (Second) of Torts § 344 (1965), including comments d and f, as controlling law? See Nivens v. 7-11 Hoagy’s Corner, 133 Wash.2d 192, 943 P.2d 286 (1997).
2) To create a genuine issue of material fact as to the foreseeability of the harm resulting from a third party’s criminal act when the defendant did not know of the dangerous propensities of the individual responsible for the criminal act, must a plaintiff show previous acts of similar…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McLeod v. Grant County School District No. 128Washington Supreme Court · 1953
- Nelson v. City of IrvineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Hilton v. Hallmark CardsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Christen v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Nivens v. CornerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- McKown v. Simon Property Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
- Centurion Properties III, LLC v. Chicago Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Carrington v. City of Tacoma, Department of Public Utilities, Light DivisionDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2017
- Jack Potter v. City of LaceyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Sadid v. VailasDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.