Legal Opinion
Yuschuk v. Eichas
New York City Family Court
Decided May 2, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*776OPINION OF THE COURT
Ann Marie Taddeo, J.
By the filing of an objection pursuant to Family Court Act § 439 (e), petitioner seeks review of the order of Hearing Examiner Roy H. Lockwood, entered March 20, 1996, which dismissed the instant support adjustment proceeding. In his decision, the Hearing Examiner rejected a proposed adjusted order of support, filed by the Monroe County Child Support Enforcement Unit (CSEU), due to an error in the calculation of current support. Petitioner specifically objects to the Hearing Examiner’s determination that his authority was limited to ruling on the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pajak v. PajakNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- MTR. STATE v. Ford Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Delaware County Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Power AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Delaware County Elec. Coop., Inc. v. POWER AUTH. OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Goon v. Fu Manchu's Restaurant, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commissioner of Social Services ex rel. Deborah W. v. Vito G.New York City Family Court · 1996
- Figueroa v. FigueroaNew York City Family Court · 1996
- Maureen K. v. James H.New York City Family Court · 1996
- Support Collection Unit ex rel. Mandel v. McNelisNew York City Family Court · 1996
- Butler v. TorrellasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998