Legal Opinion

Maureen K. v. James H.

New York City Family Court

Decided August 8, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joan S. Kohout, J.

On November 28, 1995 a proposed adjusted order of support was filed with the Monroe County Family Court by the Monroe County Child Support Enforcement Unit (CSEU) pursuant to the "adjustment of child support orders” provisions of section 413 (3) of the Family Court Act. The proposed order would have increased Mr. H.’s child support obligation from $45 per week to $106 per week. Mr. H. objected to the entry of the proposed order and the matter was referred to a Hearing Examiner of this court. (Family Ct Act § 413 [3] [c].)

After hearing testimony from both…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Borkowski v. BorkowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  2. Yuschuk v. EichasNew York City Family Court · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Support Collection Unit ex rel. Mandel v. McNelisNew York City Family Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API