Legal Opinion

Brand v. Comcast Corp. & Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 28, 2015No. 12 CV 1122PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER

Young B. Kim, United States Magistrate Judge

Cable line technicians James Brand, Barry Farmer, Mark Graham, Kevin Jackson, Michael Jackson, Jose Vigil, and Christopher Woodard (collectively, “the plaintiffs”) sued them employers, Comcast Corporation and Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC (together, “Comcast”), under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201, et *717seq., and the Illinois Minimum Wage Law (“IMWL”), 820 ILCS 105, et seq., claiming that Comcast failed to pay them for com-pensable work time. Before the court are Comcast’s motions for…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Brown v. DS Services of America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
  2. Pietrzycki v. Heights Tower Serv., Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
  3. Pietrzycki v. Heights Tower Service, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  4. Bartlett v. City Of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  5. Guzman v. Laredo Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API