Russell v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
This is a pro se civilian pay case. Plaintiff Clifton Russell, a GS-13 Government employee, alleges the GS-13 position in which he worked from April 23, 1980, to November 30, *9811980, should have been classified at GS-14. Immediately after plaintiff left that position, the employing agency, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, reclassified the position at GS-14. Thus, plaintiff reasons, he performed GS-14 duties during the relevant period but received only GS-13 pay. He brings suit to recover the additional pay.
Reduced to essentials, plaintiff is asking this court to constructively…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Baker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Smith v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Peters v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Garbacz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982