Legal Opinion

Russell v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 14, 1982No. 165-82CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This is a pro se civilian pay case. Plaintiff Clifton Russell, a GS-13 Government employee, alleges the GS-13 position in which he worked from April 23, 1980, to November 30, *9811980, should have been classified at GS-14. Immediately after plaintiff left that position, the employing agency, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, reclassified the position at GS-14. Thus, plaintiff reasons, he performed GS-14 duties during the relevant period but received only GS-13 pay. He brings suit to recover the additional pay.

Reduced to essentials, plaintiff is asking this court to constructively…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Baker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  3. Smith v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  4. Peters v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  5. Garbacz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API