Legal Opinion
Guyton v. J.M. Manufacturing, Inc.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided July 27, 1995No. Civ. A. 4:95-1248-22PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CURRIE, District Judge.
In this product liability action, Defendants moved for dismissal on statute of limitations grounds. In response to the motion, Plaintiff argued that S.C.Code Ann. § 15-3-30 operated to toll the statute of limitations. Section 15-3-30 provides:
If when a cause of action shall accrue against any person he shall be out of the State, such action may be commenced within the terms in this chapter respectively limited after the return of such person into this State. And if, after such cause of action shall have accrued, such person shall depart from and reside out of this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bendix Autolite Corp. v. Midwesco Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina v. State of S.C.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Wiggins v. EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Witt v. AMERICAN TRUCKING ASS'N, INC.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hunt v. Enzo Biochem, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Blyth v. MarcusSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999