Legal Opinion

Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 30, 2011No. Nos. 2009-5121, 2010-5029PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court filed by Circuit Judge DYK. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.

DYK, Circuit Judge.

The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission (“the Commission”) filed a physical takings claim against the United States in the Court of Federal Claims (“Claims Court”), alleging that the United States had taken its property without just compensation. The Commission claimed that temporary deviations by the Army Corps of Engineers (“the Corps”) from an operating plan for Clear-water Dam during the years 1993 to 2000 caused increased flooding in the Commission’s Dave Donaldson Black…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. State ex rel. Doner v. ZodyOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  4. Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  5. Ideker Farms, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API