Legal Opinion

Morgavi v. Mumme

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 15, 1971No. 4567PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GULOTTA, Judge.

This action was brought by plaintiff-appellant, Gaetano A. Morgavi, Jr.,1 a prospective purchaser of real property to recover his deposit of $2,100 and in addition thereto damages from the vendor, defendant-appellee. The basis of plaintiff’s claim is that the title to the property is not merchantable for the reasons that: (1) the improvements on the property violate the Zoning Ordinance of the City of New Or*280leans, and (2) the improvements violate the title restrictions which restrictions were not made known to plaintiff.

The defendant filed a reconventional demand for damages in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kay v. CarterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  2. Chandler v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Roberts v. MedlockLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Schaub v. O'QuinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
  5. Rodriguez v. ShroderLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lumber Products, Inc. v. HiriartLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Morgavi v. MummeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  3. Langford Land Co. v. Dietzgen Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. State v. WarmsbeckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Sanders v. RuddLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API