Roberts v. Medlock
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MILLS, Judge.
On March 23, 1932, Charles B. Roberts and John D. Miller, plaintiffs, contracted to sell, and William Medloek contracted to buy, lot 2 of block 4 of Miller’s Second addition to the city of Monroe. It was stipulated that defendant should receive a good and merchantable title and should pay a cash consideration of $300.
Plaintiffs bring this suit to enforce specific performance, alleging that they have tendered a deed conveying the required title, but that defendant wrongfully and unjustifiably refused to accept same and pay the price on the ground that the title so tendered is not…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Moser v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Metairie Park, Inc. v. CurrieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
- Shelly v. FriedrichsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- Marsh v. LorimerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Pattison v. MaloneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1886
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Young v. StevensSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
- Saucier v. CrichtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
- Langford Land Co. v. Dietzgen Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Vallery v. BelgardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Bart v. WysockiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.