Legal Opinion

Christopher MacDonald v. Kahikolu Ltd., Dba Frogman Charters

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 31, 2006No. 04-15979PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge.

Christopher MacDonald appeals from the final judgment entered following a bench trial before Magistrate Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi. 1 Mr. MacDonald seeks reversal on the ground that the trial court erred in concluding that the failure of Ap-pellee Kahikolu, Ltd. (“Kahikolu”), doing business as Frogman Charters, to comply with the United States Coast Guard regulations codified at 46 C.F.R., Ch. I, Subch. V, Pt. 197 (“Coast Guard regulations”) did not establish negligence per se liability under the Jones Act, 46 App. U.S.C. § 688. We vacate the judgment and remand for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kernan v. American Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Patricia Hart v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Stanley F. Taylor v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Chester Oglesby v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. Kopczynski v. The JacquelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. Kahikolu, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. McKinney v. American River Transp. Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2013
  3. Pettis v. BOSARGE DIVING, INC.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2010
  4. Habel v. Grove Farm Fish & Poi, LLCDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
  5. Layman v. Lahaina Divers, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API