Layman v. Lahaina Divers, Inc.
District Court, D. Hawaii
1Opinion of the Court
*1172 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ALAN C. KAY, Senior District Judge.
For the following reasons, the Court hereby GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND 1
This matter arises under admiralty law. Plaintiff Christopher Layman alleges that he was injured while working as a PADI certified2 SCUBA diver for Defendant La-haina Divers, Inc. (“LDI”). LDI is a dive tour company and dive shop based in La-haina Maui. (Pl.’s Concise Statement of Facts (“CSF”) ¶ 1.0.) LDI owns and operates…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jamie Gilreath v. Corey Potter, et al.District Court, D. Alaska · 2025