Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. Kahikolu, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 10, 2009No. 08-15239PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

For a second time, plaintiff Christopher MacDonald appeals the district court’s judgment after a bench trial in his Jones Act suit against defendant Kahikolu, Ltd. MacDonald worked as a crew member aboard one of Kahikolu’s ships and was injured while performing a “free dive,” an underwater dive done on a single breath without scuba equipment or other underwater breathing apparatus. In a prior opinion, a separate panel of this court vacated the district court’s judgment, and remanded for the district court to consider whether Kahikolu’s failure to comply with Coast…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Kernan v. American Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Wills v. Amerada Hess Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  4. Exxon Co. v. Sofec, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Stella Reyes, Administratrix of the Estate of Florentino Reyes, Deceased v. Vantage Steamship Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mondaca-Vega v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Hewlett-Packard Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Layman v. Lahaina Divers, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2014
  4. Mondaca-Vega v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. BRIZO, LLC., AS OWNER OF THE M/V HONEY, 2007 163 FOOT TWIN ENGINE YACHT (ON 739735)District Court, S.D. Florida · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API