Legal Opinion

State v. Lucas

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 2007No. 73A01-0512-CR-570PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATHIAS, Judge.

The State of Indiana brings this interlocutory appeal from the Shelby Superior Court's grant of suppression motions filed by Kevin J. Lucas and Matthew Winkle (collectively "the Defendants"). The State raises one issue: whether the trial court erred when it granted Defendants' motions to suppress evidence discovered in a locked container inside a stolen van the Defendants were traveling in. 1 Concluding that the trial court properly suppressed the evidence recovered from the locked metal box, we affirm.

Facts and Procedural History 2

On February 12, 2005, while on routine…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Bion Blake IngramSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  2. State v. CampbellIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State v. RhodesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Gregory Kirk v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Otis Sams, Jr. v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API