Legal Opinion

State v. Campbell

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 2009No. 09A02-0901-CR-83PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

The State appeals the trial court's order granting the motion of Jessi L. Campbell to suppress evidence obtained when officers stopped her vehicle in order to inves tigate a report of conduct meeting the definition of criminal confinement. The State presents a single issue for review, namely, whether the trial court erred when it determined that the officers did not have reasonable suspicion to stop Campbell's vehicle.

We reverse and remand.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In the early morning hours of August 23, 2008, Deputy Marshall Mike Clark of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev., Humboldt Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Hardister v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Wilson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Harper v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Michael Pugh v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Potter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Polson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Vaughn Whitt v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API