Legal Opinion
James Chang v. Merit Systems Protection Board, and United States Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 10, 1982No. 81-1596PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
We conclude, in agreement with the decisions in Wiggins v. United States Postal Service, 653 F.2d 219 (5th Cir. 1981) and Christo v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 667 F.2d 882 (10th Cir. 1981), that mixed cases involving both claims of discrimination and of improper agency action must be brought as one action in the district court. Accordingly we lack jurisdiction over the petition and it is therefore dismissed.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gary N. Wiggins v. The United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Christo v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
3Cited by10 opinions
- Joseph F. WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Lloyd J. Hayes v. United States Government Printing OfficeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Perry E. DOYAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John O. MARSH, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the Army, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- James Chang v. William French SmithCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Andrew L. Tolliver v. James Deniro, Director of Veterans Administration Medical Center, Palo Alto, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.