Christo v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Respondents Merit Systems Protection Board and the United States Postal Service seek dismissal of this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We hold that jurisdiction in this matter is vested exclusively in the district court and accordingly dismiss this appeal.
Petitioner Christo was suspended…
2Cited by22 opinions
- Joseph F. WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Galloway Farms, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Lloyd J. Hayes v. United States Government Printing OfficeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Perry E. DOYAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John O. MARSH, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the Army, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Coffman v. GlickmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.