Legal Opinion
Bushofsky v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 25, 1993No. 321 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLATT, Senior Judge.
Mary Bushofsky (claimant) appeals from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) denying her request for a transportation allowance pursuant to the *103Trade Act of 1974 (Act), as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 2296.1 We affirm.
Following the claimant’s separation from employment she applied for and was determined to be eligible for TRA training benefits. The determination also contained the notation “N/ A” in the section pertaining to transportation allowances.2 Proceeding pro se she appealed her ineligibility for a transportation allowance.
The referee held a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kirkwood v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Matvey v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Ford v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Musguire v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Asplundh Tree Expert Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Laster v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- A. Ashton v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- D.L. Wetzel v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- K. Johnson v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- M. F. Russo v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.