Legal Opinion

Conley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 20, 2013No. 1D12-5496PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this appeal from a final order of adjudication and commitment as a sexually violent predator under the Jimmy Ryce Act, appellant seeks reversal of the final order on several grounds. We agree the trial court erred in excluding evidence of a penile plethysmograph (PPG) test in disregard of the Third District Court of Appeal’s decision in State v. Fullwood, 22 So.3d 655 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009), which affirmed the admission of PPG evidence in a Jimmy Ryce Act proceeding after the trial *1121court found PPG evidence was not new or novel evidence subject to analysis under Frye v. United States, 293 F.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Pardo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  4. State v. FullwoodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Perez v. Bell South Telecommunications, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API